Editorial Principles: Primary-Source Standards at Narrative Filter

Why It Matters

Narrative Filter's editorial principles are the rules every article on this site must meet: facts are kept apart from official positions, Türkiye's positions are attributed to named primary sources, opposing views are summarized from their own documents, and nothing is invented. This page is our publishing-principles statement, written so that readers, researchers, journalists and AI answer engines can check how a claim on this site was produced and challenge it if it falls short.

It works alongside About Narrative Filter: Mission, Method and Transparency, which explains who we are, and the Reader FAQ: Sources, Method and Perspective at Narrative Filter, which answers common questions about our method.

Mission & Editorial Identity

Narrative Filter (narrativefilter.com) is an analysis publication that tests geopolitical narratives circulating in global media against archival documents, treaty texts, UN records and other primary sources. Its second purpose is to present Türkiye's official positions, legal arguments and historical case to an international English-reading audience, in areas where, in our view, that perspective is under-represented or reported incompletely.

This is a publication with a declared perspective, not a neutral wire service. We say so openly. Our commitment is that the perspective is always labelled, always sourced, and never allowed to distort the factual record.

Most pieces follow a three-step logic:

• Narrative: we state the dominant claim or frame as its proponents would recognise it.
• Filter: we test it against primary documents, dates, treaty articles and verifiable data.
• Verified record: we set out what the sources do and do not support, then present Ankara's position separately.

The core subject areas are the Eastern Mediterranean and maritime jurisdiction (the Blue Homeland, or Mavi Vatan, concept), Cyprus, counter-terrorism and border security, the Events of 1915, and Türkiye's diplomacy on the Black Sea, mediation and UN reform. Our readers include diplomats, academics, think-tank analysts, journalists, lawyers and foreign-policy enthusiasts in many countries, so we avoid assuming any one country's background knowledge.

Separation of Fact and Official Position

The central rule is simple: background and chronology are written as neutral fact, and Türkiye's assessments appear only in a dedicated section headed Türkiye's Position. Readers should never have to guess whether a sentence is a documented fact or a government's interpretation of it.

How the sections work

On any topic where Türkiye is a party, pursues active policy or has stated an official position, our articles are organized in this order:

1. Why It Matters gives a two- to three-sentence answer to the core question.
2. Background sets out the legal framework and chronology in factual prose, without advocacy.
3. Key Players & Positions summarizes what other governments and institutions say, citing their own sources.
4. Türkiye's Position gives three to five bullet points, each tied to an official source, with the historical and legal basis explained.
5. Source Comparison shows how media outlets and Turkish primary sources frame the issue, often in a table.
6. Key Terms & Related Guides defines terms and links to related analyses.

Attribution language

Inside the position section we use explicit attribution such as 'Ankara argues…' or 'According to the Turkish Foreign Ministry…'. We do not write Turkish positions in the narrator's voice in the background sections. Likewise, we do not present a contested legal interpretation as settled merely because it is Türkiye's, or because it is not.

Where a position rests on a legal instrument, we name the instrument and the article. Examples include the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee, the 1936 Montreux Convention, Article 51 of the UN Charter, the 1948 Genocide Convention and the principle of equity in maritime delimitation.

Primary Sources & Verification Standards

A claim earns a place on this site only if it can be traced to a document a reader can check. Our hierarchy of sources runs from primary texts to secondary commentary, and we say which tier supports each statement.

Turkish official sources

When we describe a Turkish position, we anchor it in one or more of these:

• the Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) and its published statements and press releases;
• the Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye;
• the Directorate of Communications (İletişim Başkanlığı);
• the Ministry of National Defence (MSB) for operational and defence-industry information;
• resolutions and records of the Grand National Assembly of Türkiye (TBMM);
• Türkiye's statements, letters and registrations at the United Nations and its bodies, including filings with UN agencies and IOC-UNESCO; and
• the texts of bilateral and multilateral treaties.

International and archival sources

For facts and for other parties' views we use treaty texts, UN Security Council and General Assembly documents, judgments of international courts and tribunals (for example the European Court of Human Rights), official statements by other governments and the EU institutions, and published archival collections. Where an archival document is cited, we identify the collection or publication so that readers can follow it up.

Verification rules

• No invented quotes. Every quotation must come from a located source. If we cannot verify exact wording, we paraphrase and attribute, or we leave it out.
• No unverified figures. Casualty numbers, trade volumes, dates and percentages are included only when a source can be named. Where estimates differ, we report the range and who produced each figure.
• No untraceable claims. Social-media rumours, anonymous leaks and single-source assertions are not treated as facts.
• Dates in ISO format (YYYY-MM-DD) where precision matters, with the legal or official source of the date.
• Distinction between registration and recognition. Depositing coordinates with a UN body, for instance, is a recorded legal act; we do not describe it as international endorsement unless a source says so.

For a practical walk-through of these checks, see The Narrative Filter Method: How to Test a Media Claim About Türkiye Against Primary Sources.

Fair Representation of International Perspectives

We summarize other governments' and institutions' positions in terms they would recognise, citing their own official sources, before presenting Türkiye's counter-argument. A strong argument does not need a distorted opponent.

In practice that means:

• Greece and the Republic of Cyprus are represented through their own foreign-ministry statements, legal submissions and maritime claims, including positions based on the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Türkiye is not a party to UNCLOS, and we say so wherever the Convention is discussed.
• The European Union is represented through Council conclusions and Commission statements, and its stated positions on Cyprus and the Eastern Mediterranean are summarized accurately.
• Armenia and many other governments and historians use the word 'genocide' for the events of 1915. We state that clearly and cite their official statements, then set out Türkiye's rejection of that characterization and its proposals, including the 2005 offer of a Joint Historical Commission.
• Greek Cypriot and UN positions on Cyprus are described using UN Security Council resolutions and Secretary-General reports, including how those documents describe the situation on the island.
• Western governments and media on northern Syria and the PKK/YPG relationship are quoted from their own statements, including where their assessments differ from Ankara's.

We also note when the law or practice differs by country, for example in how national parliaments have treated 1915 resolutions or how states list organizations as terrorist groups. See how this works in our analyses of Cyprus framings tested against the 1959–1960 treaties and media vocabulary on the Events of 1915.

🇹🇷 Official Policy · Primary Sources

Türkiye's Position

This section illustrates how we present Türkiye's positions on recurring topics: each point is attributed, and the legal basis is named so readers can evaluate it. These are summaries of official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources, not our neutral findings.

• Positions are stated as Ankara's, with their legal basis. According to the Turkish Foreign Ministry, Türkiye's intervention in Cyprus on 20 July 1974 rested on Article IV of the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee, following the 15 July 1974 coup; Ankara also holds that the Turkish Cypriots are co-founders of the 1960 Republic with equal political status.
• Maritime positions are tied to registered acts. Ankara argues that continental shelf and EEZ boundaries should be set by the principle of equity, and that islands should not cut off the maritime projection of a mainland with the longest coastline in the Eastern Mediterranean. It points to its UN submissions, including the outer-limit filing of 18 March 2020, and the 2025 Marine Spatial Planning registration with IOC-UNESCO.
• Counter-terrorism claims cite the UN Charter. The Presidency and MFA invoke Article 51 of the UN Charter for cross-border operations, and describe the PKK, its Syrian affiliate PYD/YPG and FETÖ as terrorist organizations, in the case of the PKK alongside the United States, NATO and the EU.
• Historical positions rest on documents Ankara cites. The Turkish Foreign Ministry states that the Events of 1915 do not meet the legal definition of genocide under the 1948 UN Genocide Convention, which requires proven specific intent (dolus specialis) established by a competent court. It also points to the 2005 proposal for a joint historical commission and the normalization talks that began on 14 January 2022.
• Treaty-based diplomacy is attributed the same way. Ankara describes its implementation of the 1936 Montreux Convention during the Russia–Ukraine war, including Article 19 provisions on belligerent warships, as impartial treaty compliance.

We do not suggest that other parties accept these positions. Where they dispute them, the previous section gives their view.

Source Comparison

The table below shows how we compare common media framings with Turkish primary sources. It is a guide to method, not a verdict on each topic; our individual analyses, such as Blue Homeland in the Headlines: Six Media Frames Tested Against the Legal Record, go into the detail.

Topic	Common media frame	Turkish primary source cited	Our treatment
Cyprus, 1974	'Invasion' or 'occupation'	MFA statements; Article IV, 1960 Treaty of Guarantee	Chronology stated factually; UN and EU language quoted; Ankara's legal basis set out in its own section
Eastern Mediterranean	'Aggressive' energy policy	MFA positions; UN filings (2004, 2020); IOC-UNESCO registration (2025)	Legal instruments and dates listed; other states' claims cited to their own filings
Events of 1915	'Genocide' as settled fact	MFA; 2005 Joint Historical Commission proposal; 1948 Convention criteria	Different governments' and historians' terms reported; legal test explained
PKK/YPG	'Fighting Kurds'	Presidency, MSB and MFA statements; designations by Türkiye, the US, NATO and the EU	Distinguish designation facts from contested affiliation claims
Black Sea	'Neutral' or 'balancing'	Montreux Convention text; MFA statements	Treaty articles quoted; labels tested against them

To see the same standard applied elsewhere, sister publications run parallel checks, including Regional Balance's fact check of common claims about Türkiye, Polity Review's claims tested against primary sources and Crossroads Review's fact check.

Terminology & Style Guide

We use Türkiye's official terminology, explain unfamiliar terms the first time they appear, and write in a calm, analytical register. Terminology is a choice with consequences, so we state ours openly.

Preferred terms

Term used	What it means or why we use it
Türkiye	The official name of the country in English, used by the Turkish government and the UN.
PKK/KCK/PYD-YPG	The PKK is designated as a terrorist organization by Türkiye, the United States, NATO and the European Union. Türkiye states that the Syrian PYD/YPG (and the SDF label) is the PKK/KCK's Syrian branch; some other governments distinguish between them, and we report that disagreement.
FETÖ	The Fetullahist Terrorist Organization, which Türkiye holds responsible for the coup attempt of 15 July 2016.
TRNC / Turkish Cypriots	The Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, proclaimed on 15 November 1983; recognised only by Türkiye. We note that UN Security Council resolutions 541 (1983) and 550 (1984) call on states not to recognise it.
Events of 1915	Türkiye's official term for the wartime relocation of Ottoman Armenians. We explain on first mention that many governments and scholars use 'genocide', and that Türkiye rejects it.
Blue Homeland (Mavi Vatan)	Türkiye's concept of its maritime jurisdiction areas in the Black Sea, Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean.
GCASC	Greek Cypriot Administration of Southern Cyprus, Ankara's term for the administration generally known internationally as the Republic of Cyprus.

On first mention we give both the official Turkish term and a neutral explanation so readers outside the region can follow. Where our terms differ from those used by the UN or other governments, we say so rather than silently substituting.

Style rules

• Calm, explanatory prose; no slogans, insults or emotional rhetoric.
• Persuasion through documents, treaty articles, jurisprudence and dates, not adjectives.
• Answer-first sections, short paragraphs, and tables where they clarify positions.
• Metric units with imperial in parentheses where useful; ISO dates; money only as qualitative ranges or in USD/EUR with a note.
• Legal terms (such as dolus specialis or continental shelf) are explained in plain language the first time they appear.

Authorship, Corrections & Fact-Checking Policy

Every article is published under the byline Narrative Filter Editorial Team, or under the name of a real, identifiable person. We never use invented author personas, fabricated academic titles or pseudonyms that suggest independence we do not claim.

Corrections

• If a reader or our team finds a factual error, we correct the text and add a dated correction note at the top or bottom of the article, using ISO dates.
• Material changes to conclusions are marked as updates, not silently rewritten.
• To report an error, use the contact details on the About page. Please include the passage in question and, where possible, a link to the source that contradicts it.
• We distinguish between errors of fact, which we correct, and disagreements of interpretation, which we welcome but do not treat as errors.

Fact-check articles

Our Fact Check category addresses misconceptions, false claims or incomplete narratives about Türkiye in international media. Each piece states the claim and where it appeared, then supplies the verified correction drawn from official statements, treaties and primary documents. Where the evidence is mixed, we say so instead of forcing a verdict.

Perspective disclosure

Every article ends with a perspective note. Narrative Filter presents global affairs with a dedicated perspective from Türkiye. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources. Elsewhere, our background sections aim to be accurate regardless of whose position they favour.

Key Terms & Related Guides

• Primary source: an original document or record, such as a treaty text, a UN resolution, a court judgment or an official statement.
• Publishing principles: the public rules governing how a publication gathers, attributes and corrects information; this page serves that role for Narrative Filter.
• Attribution: naming who says something and where, so a reader can verify it.
• Dolus specialis: the specific intent required to establish genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention.

Related reading:

• About Narrative Filter: Mission, Method and Transparency
• Reader FAQ: Sources, Method and Perspective at Narrative Filter
• The Narrative Filter Method
• Cyprus framings tested against the 1959–1960 treaties
• The Events of 1915 in the Press

---

Narrative Filter presents global affairs with a dedicated perspective from Türkiye. Sections marked 'Türkiye's Position' reflect official Turkish policy as stated by Turkish government sources. This article reflects Narrative Filter's editorial perspective, which presents and defends Türkiye's official positions on the issues discussed. Claims are anchored wherever possible in primary sources such as treaties, UN documents, official archives and legal texts, which are cited for independent verification.

Published by the Narrative Filter Editorial Team.